The news feed is client side, this is out of the scope of this project atm, chat can be easily worked out

And btw, I just came back from work with people that have real problems, that might explain my harsh response.

Ok, you go the single route I did not expect you to go. You critizise us now. That’s ridiculous on one hand and idiotic on the other hand.

1. If what we say here annoys you, then you apparently don’t want to take this seriously as we do. This could mean you consider it as a joke. I can tell you, it’s not a funny joke.
2. We don’t discuss everything on youtube, only unusual things. If we were to do that, we would completely mess up these forums. Yes this could be said on youtube, but if it was true, it would be interesting enough to post it here.
3. Are we rude or offensive for reacting to youtube posts here? You realize, I hope, that this is like insulting another person somwhere where everybody does that and then criticizing that person for complaining.
4. If you react aggresively («Stay out of this») instead of neutral, you only further make yourself seem dishonest.
5. I am a moderator, you are a ‘participant’, guess who decides what is approriate here.
6. It’s not a thing between Darwin and You. If you are a liar (and not one wo can admit it), wherever you may behave like that, it is relevant for your participation on these forums.

I give you a last chance to convince me of your innocence. Answer with «I am willing to rethink my behaviour». I am willing to rethink my behaviour myself, so we are equal on that. If you care for my respect, respond like I offered you and I am willing to apologize. If you don’t, you have lost it completely.

If you stay with your opinion, read this:

• I am certain that Darwin will not give anything to a person like you.
• There have been statements by LEGO completely incompatible with your claim.
• You can forget to work with me and thus likely with all current developers of LUNI.
• You can be assured that you will not recieve any help on these forums from me anymore.
  (And this might prove extremely painful to you in the not so far future)

Please don’t let my question your maturity more than I do already.
(If @LegoClub is a minor, and you as the person reading it are a parent to that child, be assured, that I tried treating him as a mature person, but consider myself incapable of continuing that. If this message has a negative influence on your child, please accept my sincerest apologies. I’m neither qualified nor experienced enough to handle this kind of situation appropriately, so please keep in mind that this is a volontary role for me and try to protect your child from these uncomfortable situations with appropriate minority settings on your/his computer.)
(If you, @LegoClub are not minor, or don’t feel minor, try to deal with this yourself)

• Esta respuesta fue modificada hace 9 años, 8 meses por Xiphoseer.

Not that I don’t believe you, but this sound very much like an excuse. If you make such statement, they are not considered real until you can prove it. You’ll have to ask LEGO again or at least specify when the mail was sent, who sent it (LEGO has more than one person sending mails). You could of course say, you don’t remember, but if this topic is so important for you, you should have paid attention, and it will only further invalidate your claim. And the most important question: Why would they only send it to you? And why did you summarize and not copy the e-mail. (Don’t tell me LEGO writes mails in that style, that wording sounds extremely like your language).

The reason I respond to this in this fashion is, that it is useless to be annoying to get somthing, but a very unwelcome behaviour to lie. You said somwhere else that you want to help here, so be reminded that being dishonest disqualifies you from working with us, and even if you were very knowledgable, people would not want to work with you.

The news are in the client, we can’t do anything about that atm. Making the chat display arbitary messags is easily possible, we might have a system someday that is like: Chat::send(systemAddress addr, std::wstring message) and Chat::broadcast(std::wstring message)

The rocket models are broken, because they use static packets. you are supposed to just press shift near a launchpad.